DogStark / DogStark/petChain-Frontend

[Frontend] Introduce runtime validation for backend responses

Open
#843 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
enhancement frontend help wanted
Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
3
Forks
158
Avg merge
3d 6h
Merged PRs (30d)
36

Description

## Problem

TypeScript interfaces do not validate untrusted JSON, and malformed nested data has caused renderer crashes.

## Relevant code

`src/lib/api`

## Proposed scope

Add runtime schemas at API boundaries, return typed validation errors, and test missing, extra, and malicious fields.

## Acceptance criteria

- [ ] The reported behavior is reproduced or characterized with a focused automated test before the fix.
- [ ] The implementation satisfies the proposed scope without weakening TypeScript, lint, authorization, privacy, or error handling.
- [ ] Success, empty/loading where applicable, failure, and boundary cases are covered.
- [ ] Existing related tests pass and new regression coverage is included.
- [ ] User-facing behavior remains accessible by keyboard and at mobile viewport sizes where UI is affected.
- [ ] Documentation is updated when the change alters configuration, contracts, security assumptions, or contributor workflow.

## Contributor notes

Base the work on the latest `main` branch. Keep unrelated refactors out of the pull request and include screenshots or recordings for visible changes. Never use real pet, medical, contact, wallet, or credential data in fixtures.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

Start by inspecting the API boundary code under src/lib/api and characterize the malformed-response behavior with a focused automated test. Done means runtime validation covers missing, extra, and malicious fields, returns typed validation errors, and includes success, empty/loading where applicable, failure, and boundary-case regression coverage.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
typescript
Domain
api, frontend
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
55/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.