Notes on Databases and Rust are misleading

https://dioxuslabs.com/learn/0.7/tutorial/databases#notes-on-databases-and-rust lists several database libraries and explicitly calls out diesel for not having async support. This is in the best case misleading as [diesel-async](https://crates.io/crates/diesel-async) exists for more than 5 years at this point. It's also definitely production ready as it is used to serve almost all the crates in the rust ecosystem via crates.io.

Even without the existence of this crate the selection still contains crates like rusqlite that don't provide an async API as well.
Beside of that, the other parts of the page promote using SQLite as database for a lot of use-cases. Due to how SQLite works it is more or less incompatible with async rust interface and only usable with an high performance penalty there.

That all written: It still fine to dislike diesel, maybe just don't try to hide that behind untrue arguments like this?

Open the linked Databases and Rust tutorial section and review its statements about Diesel, diesel-async, rusqlite, SQLite, and async Rust. Update the guidance so the claims are accurate and balanced, then verify that the rendered page no longer presents misleading reasons for or against these libraries.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.