Document project scope and status
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 4.1k
- Forks
- 203
- Avg merge
- 8h 58m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 112
Description
I find the idea of a native wgpu based renderer amazing, however I wonder how much is planned to be implemented to be on parity with the web based alternatives. Perhaps having a compatibility table would be nice? Going beyond the PoC seems like a major effort to replicate the many things a web view does(e.g. accessibility, text input, grid model, animations/transitions, css custom props, no web components 😢, etc.)
Contributor guide
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by reviewing the current native wgpu renderer and comparing its supported features with the web-based alternatives listed in the issue. Done means a project-scope document or compatibility table that records current status and planned coverage.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100