BOM Validation: add component name to the error

### Current Behavior

With the new BOM Validation, the HTTP 400 response could be improved to more easily pin-point the failing component

For example, this is an API response we have recently received
```
{
"status": 400,
"title": "The uploaded BOM is invalid",
"detail": "Schema validation failed",
"errors": [
"$.components[928].externalReferences[1].url: does not match the iri-reference pattern must be a valid RFC 3987 IRI-reference",
"$.components[928].externalReferences[1].url: does not match the iri-reference pattern must be a valid RFC 3987 IRI-reference",
"$.components[928].externalReferences[1].url: does not match the regex pattern ^urn:cdx:[0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{12}/[1-9][0-9]*$",
"$.components[928].externalReferences[1].url: does not match the iri-reference pattern must be a valid RFC 3987 IRI-reference",
"$.components[928].externalReferences[1].url: does not match the regex pattern ^urn:cdx:[0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{12}/[1-9][0-9]*#.+$",
"$.components[984].externalReferences[1].url: does not match the iri-reference pattern must be a valid RFC 3987 IRI-reference",
"$.components[984].externalReferences[1].url: does not match the iri-reference pattern must be a valid RFC 3987 IRI-reference",
"$.components[984].externalReferences[1].url: does not match the regex pattern ^urn:cdx:[0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{12}/[1-9][0-9]*$",
"$.components[984].externalReferences[1].url: does not match the iri-reference pattern must be a valid RFC 3987 IRI-reference",
"$.components[984].externalReferences[1].url: does not match the regex pattern ^urn:cdx:[0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{12}/[1-9][0-9]*#.+$"
]
}

```

### Proposed Behavior

Log the component name, or line number in the uploaded JSON.

### Checklist

- [X] I have read and understand the [contributing guidelines](https://github.com/DependencyTrack/dependency-track/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#filing-issues)
- [X] I have checked the [existing issues](https://github.com/DependencyTrack/dependency-track/issues) for whether this enhancement was already requested