One to One mapping and join two condition, how to set splitOn
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 18.4k
- Forks
- 3.7k
- Avg merge
- 5h 8m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
my sql is like this
string sql = SELECT * FROM B JOIN A ON B.ColumnD = A.ColumnD AND B.ColumnE = A.ColumnE
class TestA
{
public string ColumnD { get; set; }
public string ColumnE { get; set; }
public string ColumnF { get; set; }
public string ColumnG { get; set; }
}
class TestB
{
public string ColumnA { get; set; }
public string ColumnB { get; set; }
public string ColumnC { get; set; }
public string ColumnD { get; set; }
public string ColumnE { get; set; }
public TestA Item { get; set; }
}
this is one to one mapping result
#IEnumerable<TestB> GetTestB()
{
return Connection.Query<TestB, TestA, TestB>(
sql,
(b, a) =>
{
b.Item = a;
return b;
},
splitOn: "ColumnD,ColumnE");
}
but the result TestA always NULL
splitOn setting wrong?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the Connection.Query<TestB, TestA, TestB> call, the SQL JOIN, and the TestA/TestB class definitions shown in the issue. Reproduce the one-to-one mapping using the current splitOn value and inspect which returned columns are used to construct TestA. Done means determining the correct mapping behavior and documenting or testing the expected non-null TestA result.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- csharp, sql
- Domain
- backend, database
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100