bry problem
- Dominant language
- Fortran
- Stars
- 156
- Forks
- 75
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
What is the reason for high boundary values when drawing tidal currents?
LBC(isFsur) == Cha Cha Cha Cha ! free-surface
LBC(isUbar) == Fla Fla Fla Fla ! 2D U-momentum
LBC(isVbar) == Fla Fla Fla Fla ! 2D V-momentum
LBC(isUvel) == Rad Rad Rad Rad ! 3D U-momentum
LBC(isVvel) == Rad Rad Rad Rad ! 3D V-momentum
LBC(isMtke) == Gra Gra Gra Gra ! mixing TKE
LBC(isTvar) == RadNud RadNud RadNud RadNud\ ! temperature
RadNud RadNud RadNud RadNud ! salinity
TNUDG == 2.000d0 ! days
ZNUDG == 0.001d0 ! days
M2NUDG == 0.001d0 ! days
M3NUDG == 0.001d0 ! days
! Factor between passive (outflow) and active (inflow) open boundary
! conditions, [1:Ngrids]. If OBCFAC > 1, nudging on inflow is stronger
! than on outflow (recommended).
OBCFAC == 5.0d0 ! nondimensional
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by identifying the tidal-current case and boundary-condition input represented by the attached image, then trace how the listed LBC, nudging, and OBCFAC settings are applied. Done means a reproducible explanation of the high boundary values or a narrowed configuration-specific defect.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- fortran
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100