DDMAL / DDMAL/UMIL

We need a criteria for a "simple verification process"

Open
#214 5 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
documentation question
Dominant language
Python
Stars
4
Forks
2
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

This criteria will then be applied to possible branches for this verification process. Currently, options are: Django, Wikibase. Or, relational-vs-graph database.

Currently @mailynmailyn will be working on developing a basic verification workflow/pipeline for items from UMIL in a django approach, and I will be working on a Wikibase pipeline for the same.

We'll want to test:
1) ease of use
2) rapidity/how quickly can we do this
3) how easy is it to make a mess
3a)how easy is it to undo said mess
4) metrics?

Any ideas for other steps/things we'll want the verification process to include?

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

Start by comparing the proposed Django verification workflow/pipeline with the Wikibase pipeline, including the relational-versus-graph database options. Define the criteria for ease of use, speed, cleanup and undoing mistakes, and metrics; done means the project has an agreed evaluation checklist for testing both approaches.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
django, python
Domain
backend, databases
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.