different results showing up for the IC and NIC
Open
Interactive Classifier
- Dominant language
- CSS
- Stars
- 46
- Forks
- 13
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
We have run the [E2E OMR workflow](http://ddmal.music.mcgill.ca/e2e-omr-documentation/hints.html) with Interactive Classifier and with Non-Interactive Classifier for Salzinnes 028r folio in Rodan2, using the same training data, and different results were showing up on Neon, as follows:
028r with IC:

028r with NIC:

And IC didn't identify any clefs, while NIC identified several C clefs and one F clef, which seems better. But we were not sure why they have different results, as we didn't do any classification in IC.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.