CulverLab / CulverLab/sparcd-requirements
US-025 — Review results with sample location, time, and related records
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 0
- Avg merge
- 18h 56m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
## User story
> As an eDNA interpreter, I want to review results with sample location, time, and related records, so that I can draw sound conclusions about what was present.
| Project field | Value |
|---|---|
| Rank | 25 |
| MoSCoW | Should have |
| Persona | eDNA interpreter |
| Wiki source | E3 |
## Planning notes
Draft — validate with interpreters. Interpretations must be attributed and must not overwrite raw results.
## Source
[SPARCd Personas & User Stories](https://github.com/CulverLab/sparcd-requirements/wiki/User-Stories)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start with the linked SPARCd Personas & User Stories wiki page and the E3 source entry; the planning notes say the draft must be validated with interpreters. Clarify how review results should expose sample location, time, and related records, while preserving raw results and attributing interpretations. Done requires validated requirements and acceptance criteria.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- bioinformatics
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100