ContextLab / ContextLab/llmXive
[engine-failure] PROJ-436-assessing-the-validity-of-statistical-si @ spec: RuntimeError
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 4
- Forks
- 2
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Automated report (spec 023 / FR-016) — an unexpected engine failure occurred while processing **PROJ-436-assessing-the-validity-of-statistical-si** at stage `spec`.
```
RuntimeError: LLMReviewer[testability]: review frontmatter has neither `verdict:` nor `concerns:`/`action_items:` — a contentless/truncated review MUST NOT count as acceptance (false-convergence guard). First 200 chars: '```yaml\n---\nreviewer_name: testability\nreviewer_kind: llm\nstage: specified\nartifact_path: projects/PROJ-436-assessing-the-validity-of-statistical-si/specs/001-assessing-the-validity-of-statistical-si/'
```
The project remains schedulable; it will retry on its normal cadence and recover once the underlying defect is fixed. Closing this issue does not require any project-state change.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start with the spec-stage processing for PROJ-436-assessing-the-validity-of-statistical-si and the LLMReviewer[testability] frontmatter validation. Reproduce the failure from spec 023 / FR-016, inspect the review artifact under projects/PROJ-436-assessing-the-validity-of-statistical-si/specs/001-assessing-the-validity-of-statistical-si/, and verify that contentless or truncated reviews do not count as acceptance while valid verdict or concerns/action_items metadata does.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- ai
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 58/100