Concordium / Concordium/concordium.github.io
Review Smart Contracts>References (including subpages): Language and guidelines review
Open
[Type] Documentation
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 19
- Forks
- 40
- Avg merge
- 1d 12h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 4
Description
This review should focus on:
* Grammar and language accuracy
* Writing style consistency
* Adherence to documentation guidelines
Review is complete when:
* Page has been reviewed for grammar and language
* Writing style follows our guidelines
* Suggested changes are documented in a PR
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start with the Smart Contracts References page and its subpages, then compare the wording against the project's documentation guidelines. Review grammar, language accuracy, and style consistency across the pages; the work is done when suggested changes are documented in a pull request.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100