Concordium / Concordium/concordium.github.io

Consider feedback from Nexera developer

Open
#1,042 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
[Type] Documentation
Dominant language
Python
Stars
19
Forks
40
Avg merge
1d 12h
Merged PRs (30d)
4

Description

From [Slack](https://concordium.slack.com/archives/C07CUHQGHRR/p1721226059851409).

* it took me some time to realize there is a difference between identites and verifialbe-credentials, but it makes total sense once i realized that
* I really like the glossary [https://developer.concordium.software/en/mainnet/net/resources/glossary.html#term-Account-credential](https://developer.concordium.software/en/mainnet/net/resources/glossary.html#term-Account-credential) but sometimes I thought I’d click on a link with more examples / elaboration but was just pointed to the glossary screen
* [https://developer.concordium.software/en/mainnet/net/web3-id/issuer.html#concordium-issuer-tool](https://developer.concordium.software/en/mainnet/net/web3-id/issuer.html#concordium-issuer-tool) you mention issuer tool, but there is no direct link to it to the github
* [https://developer.concordium.software/en/mainnet/net/guides/create-proofs.html#:\~:text=You%20can%20find%20more%20information%20about%20building%20proof%20statements%20in%20the%20Concordium%20node%20SDK%20js%20repository](https://developer.concordium.software/en/mainnet/net/guides/create-proofs.html#:\~:text=You%20can%20find%20more%20information%20about%20building%20proof%20statements%20in%20the%20Concordium%20node%20SDK%20js%20repository). leads to a 404
* no code examples for how the data reveal in case of compliance request would work

* here is a flow mentioned [https://developer.concordium.software/en/mainnet/net/concepts/id-accounts.html#disclosing-an-identity](https://developer.concordium.software/en/mainnet/net/concepts/id-accounts.html#disclosing-an-identity)

* [https://developer.concordium.software/en/mainnet/net/web3-id/index.html](https://developer.concordium.software/en/mainnet/net/web3-id/index.html) might make sense to split ID layer into 2 sections?

* identity-providers
* verifiable-credential-issuers
* After our calls and some research i realised these are 2 different entities… which can be issued by same company (or not)… but they work a bit differently and probably have different tech assumptions under the hood

* currently ID layer is more refering to the VCs than Identity themselves… so maybe a section for IDPs specifically would be nice to have

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.