Parallax Gating: Am I Missing Something?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 742
- Forks
- 59
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Your demo scenes must have wider baselines between cameras/rays than my own. The result is moderately more stable rays / triangulation than I am able to achieve in some cases. I just thought I'd point that out- maybe I'm missing something?
Might be worth gating the initialized points based on ray parallax?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files or tests are named. Start by locating the demo scenes and the code that initializes points from camera rays, then compare their ray parallax with the reported cases. Done means agreeing on a parallax-gating behavior and showing that it improves initialization stability without breaking reconstruction.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- jupyter-notebook, pytorch
- Domain
- computer-vision
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100