[Feature Request]: Please exchange Ace-Step templates

### Description

Hello and thank you for your great work,
but please change the poor ace-step templates!

The native implementation delivers such poor quality that I personally never touched Ace-Step again after a short test 6 months ago.
For the past few days I've been playing around with Ace-Step again, first with the native template and then with the GRadio directly from Ace-Step. The sound quality difference is night and day. Ace-Step can produce high-quality audio, but the comfyui template only delivers extremely poor quality.

Now that I'm using these nodes, I have the same high-end quality in ComfyUI as when using Gradio:
https://github.com/billwuhao/ComfyUI_ACE-Step

No offense intended, but if there's such a cool model like the Ace-Step, and a great tool like ComfyUI, why only allow users to use it with such poor quality? I don't think that's fair to Ace-Step. If more users in ComfyUI created high-end quality tracks using the templates, there might be more supporters for Ace-Step.
Or, there could be people who install ComfyUI to make music, then hear the poor quality and delete ComfyUI again.

I'm just a ComfyUI user and would be very happy if you could replace the native templates with the templates from the Node creator.

Thank you very much.

**ps:** here is a short sample of what can be done with ace-step and the right nodes, that is not possible in this quality with the native template:
https://voca.ro/14BHNr7bwBXu