Review false-positive flag findings and run node extraction for comfyui-ocio

I publish ComfyUI-OCIO, registry id comfyui-ocio, under the publisher slavasexton. It provides nine Nuke-style OpenColorIO nodes for ComfyUI: Read, Write, Player, ColorSpace, LogConvert, Display, CDLTransform, FileTransform, and LookTransform. It reads stills, image sequences, and video, grades in ACES, and writes EXR, TIFF, PNG, JPEG, ProRes, DNxHR, h264, and hevc with color management.

## 1. Flagged status on 1.2.3

Could you review the Flagged status on versions 1.2.3 and 1.2.4? The status reason can be reproduced through the registry API request for either version with `include_status_reason=true`. Because the scanner matches the source code, publishing another version with the same ffmpeg calls would be flagged in the same way, which is why I am asking rather than simply republishing.

```
curl -s "https://api.comfy.org/versions?nodeId=comfyui-ocio&include_status_reason=true&pageSize=10"
```

The response contains 11 YARA findings, all with severity `info`. There are no medium, high, or critical findings.

Nine findings are `python_command_injection_risk`. Each is a `subprocess.run` call using an argument list such as `[binary, "-v", "error", ...]` for ffmpeg or ffprobe. None uses `shell=True`, and none builds a command string. The rule description says it detects all `os.system` and `subprocess` usage, so these appear to be false positives for these specific calls.

One `python_environment_manipulation` finding is from reading `os.environ["OCIO"]`. OpenColorIO uses that variable to tell an application where to locate the active OCIO configuration. The code reads the variable and does not write it.

One `python_network_operations` finding is in `web/ocio_io.js`, matching `.connect(` in lines such as `source.connect(splitter)` and `gain.connect(ctx.destination)`. Those lines build a Web Audio API audio graph in the browser for the Player node volume meter. They are not network operations, and this appears to be a Python network rule matching a JavaScript file.

As a neutral comparison, comfyui-videohelpersuite calls ffmpeg through subprocess in several files, and its recent registry versions are Active. That suggests the subprocess pattern can be accepted when the usage is reviewed in context.

## 2. Node extraction has not run

Could the node-list extraction also be run for this pack? Both 1.2.3 and 1.2.4 show `comfy_node_extract_status` as pending, so ComfyUI-Manager displays "No nodes found." I built the registry-backend `node-pack-extract` container and ran it against the published 1.2.4 CDN archive. It returned `{"success": true}` and extracted all nine nodes.

My reading of the backend is that publishing sends notifications only. Extraction runs when `TriggerComfyNodesBackfill` is called, whose only caller is the admin `ComfyNodesBackfill` endpoint. I cannot trigger that by republishing. I am not asking for special treatment, only for comfyui-ocio to be included when the next extraction backfill runs.

There appear to be related cases in registry-web issue 265, open since May, and registry-backend issue 185, open since June. This looks like a recurring situation rather than a one-off. Because ComfyUI-Manager requests only Active and Pending versions, the pack currently resolves to zero installable registry versions.

## 3. Thank you

Thank you as well to the people at Comfy-Org who noticed these tools on LinkedIn. I plan to keep publishing and maintaining tools officially on the registry regularly, and would like to establish a working path for future packs.

Start by reproducing the status reasons with the versions API request using include_status_reason=true, then trace TriggerComfyNodesBackfill and the admin ComfyNodesBackfill endpoint in the registry backend. Done means the 11 findings are reviewed in context and the next extraction backfill processes comfyui-ocio so its nine nodes are found.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.