ClosedXML / ClosedXML/ClosedXML.Report
Offer: help maintaining ClosedXML.Report
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 647
- Forks
- 122
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi @b0bi79, @Pankraty,
I'm Dimitrie. With a volunteer team I'm building **Rendlio**, a commercial XLSX→PDF rendering engine for .NET, and ClosedXML.Report is the template-filling library our own documentation recommends to users — so we have a direct, long-term interest in this project staying healthy. About us, up front: the engine will ship **source-available and free in production for anyone under $1M revenue** (every release becomes Apache-2.0 open source four years later); the larger companies that do pay fund charities, not shareholders — we're founding a Swiss association whose statutes pledge the profits to good causes. We mention it because it shapes how we behave in the ecosystem: upstream-first, credit where it's due.
We noticed recent releases are mostly compatibility bumps tracking ClosedXML core, and we'd like to help — under your direction, on your terms:
- triaging issues and reproducing bugs
- PRs for fixes and for compatibility with new ClosedXML releases
- extra testing: we run ClosedXML.Report output through our rendering QA pipeline, which catches template-engine edge cases early
If co-maintenance is more than you want, no hard feelings at all — we'll simply keep contributing ordinary PRs like any user. If it is welcome, tell us how you'd prefer to start (a first issue to take, your review rules — whatever suits you).
Thanks for the library.
— Dimitrie Vatra · hello@rendlio.com
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
No file, test, entry point, or concrete change is named in the offer. Start by asking the maintainers to nominate a first issue and explain their review expectations; the work is ready to begin only once a specific task and completion criteria are agreed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- csharp
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100