Make `boundary_names` part of internals
Open
enhancement
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 117
- Forks
- 19
- Avg merge
- 3d 4h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 41
Description
I think we can make `boundary_names` part of internals. If we pass Z-points, then we can assume `boundary_names`.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Locate the implementation and call sites for `boundary_names`, then trace how Z-points are passed through the relevant internals. Clarify the intended assumption and scope before changing the internal representation; done means the change is consistently applied without breaking existing boundary handling.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100