CivicTechTO / CivicTechTO/organization
Code of Conduct Policy, Committee, & Procedure Development
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
# Code of Conduct Policy, Committee, & Procedure Development
For CivicTech Toronto
Project Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1nXiUVstvUPtfRV0D8YOq301utIdT8Nxt
## Objective
The objective of this initiative is to develop a Code of Conduct (CoC) policy, committee structure, and procedural framework for CivicTech Toronto. This includes establishing a transparent and enforceable reporting and response mechanism that aligns with best practices in community governance.
The policy and procedures will:
- Define expected behaviors and unacceptable conduct.
- Establish a dedicated CoC Committee for governance and enforcement.
- Provide clear reporting mechanisms for community members.
- Outline a structured response procedure for handling CoC violations.
- Ensure information handling and access controls to maintain confidentiality and fairness.
- Implement testing and validation to ensure process effectiveness before full rollout.
## Phases & Scope
This initiative will be delivered in a phased approach.
**Phase 0 - Kick-Off / Charter**
Establish foundational planning, governance, and administrative structures.
- [x] 0 - Administrative
- [x] 0.1 - Initiative Planning & Admin @jordyarms
- [x] 0.2 - Initiative Governance @alexwolson
**Phase 1 - Policy & Process Develop**
Develop the core components of the Code of Conduct policy, committee rules, and procedures.
- [ ] 0 - Administrative
- [ ] 0.3 - Steering Committee Approval Gate @jordyarms
- [ ] 1 - CoC
- [ ] 1.1 - Code of Conduct Policy
- [ ] 2 - CoC Committee
- [ ] 2.1 - Committee Rules & Process
- [ ] 3 - Reporting
- [ ] 3.1 - Reporting Process
- [ ] 3.2 - Reporting Materials (Templates)
- [ ] 4 - Review @jordyarms
- [ ] 4.1 - Review Procedure
- [ ] 4.2 - Investigation Report Template
- [ ] 5 - Information Handling, Access, and Controls @alexwolson
- [ ] 5.1 - Information Handling, Access, and Controls Rules & Procedures
**Phase 2 - Implementation & Testing**
Implement, test, and refine policies and processes before full release.
- [ ] 0 - Administrative
- [ ] 0.4 - Integrated Testing
- [ ] 0.5 - Steering Committee Approval Gate @jordyarms
- [ ] 2 - CoC Committee
- [ ] 2.1 - Committee Selection
- [ ] 3 - Reporting
- [ ] 3.3 - Reporting Process Test
- [ ] 4 - Response
- [ ] 4.4 - Response Procedure Test
- [ ] 5 - Information Handling, Access, and Controls
- [ ] 5.2 - Information Handling, Access, and Controls System Configuration
- [ ] 5.3 - Information Handling, Access, and Controls Responsibility Assignment
- [ ] 5.4 - Information Handling, Access, and Controls Test
**Phase 3 - Release**
Officially launch the Code of Conduct policy and processes.
- [ ] 1 - CoC
- [ ] 1.2 - CoC Release
- [ ] 2 - CoC Committee
- [ ] 2.2 - CoC Committee Instantiation
- [ ] 3 - Reporting
- [ ] 3.4 - Reporting Process Release
**Phase 4 - Closing**
Finalize the initiative with proper documentation and evaluation.
- [ ] 0 - Administrative
- [ ] 0.6 - Closing @jordyarms
## Success Criteria
- A clear, accessible, and enforceable CoC policy is developed and adopted.
- A functioning CoC Committee is established with defined roles and responsibilities.
- A transparent reporting system is implemented and tested.
- A structured response procedure is in place and operational.
- Data security and confidentiality measures are implemented and verified.
- Feedback mechanisms are established to continuously improve CoC processes.
## Additional Considerations
- Community Engagement: Ensure ongoing community input and feedback during development.
- Training & Awareness: Provide training sessions and awareness campaigns for CivicTech Toronto members.
- Continuous Improvement: Set up periodic reviews of the CoC policy and procedures to adapt to evolving community needs.
- Routine Testing & Training: Establish a schedule for periodic tests of reporting and response procedures and ongoing training for committee members and community stakeholders.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.