CherryHQ / CherryHQ/cherry-studio

[Other]: Why I'm still stuck on version 1.5.6

Open
#11,640 5 comments 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub
data
Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
51.8k
Forks
5k
Avg merge
2d 7h
Merged PRs (30d)
600

Description

> [!NOTE]
> This issue/comment/review was translated by Claude.

### Pre-submission Checklist

- [x] I understand that Issues are for feedback and problem-solving, not for complaints, and I will provide as much information as possible to help resolve the issue.
- [x] I have checked the pinned Issues and searched through existing [open Issues](https://github.com/CherryHQ/cherry-studio/issues) and [closed Issues](https://github.com/CherryHQ/cherry-studio/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aclosed%20) and didn't find similar questions.
- [x] I have written a short and clear title that helps developers quickly understand the nature of my question, rather than vague titles like "A question" or "Help needed".
- [x] My question doesn't fall under bug reports or feature requests categories.

### Platform

Windows

### Version

1.5.6

### Question Description

I also followed the upgrades, but eventually reverted to version 1.5.6.
1. This version provides footnotes (citations) when using the knowledge base, making it clear at a glance, which seems to have been removed in later versions;
2. This version lists corresponding models and knowledge bases in the conversation window when @model and @knowledge_base are used, making it clear at a glance, which seems to have been removed in later versions.

### Relevant Context

I also followed the upgrades, but eventually reverted to version 1.5.6.
1. This version provides footnotes (citations) when using the knowledge base, making it clear at a glance, which seems to have been removed in later versions;
2. This version lists corresponding models and knowledge bases in the conversation window when @model and @knowledge_base are used, making it clear at a glance, which seems to have been removed in later versions.

### Attempted Solutions

_No response_

### Additional Information

_No response_

---

Original Content

### Pre-submission Checklist

- [x] I understand that Issues are for feedback and problem-solving, not for complaints, and I will provide as much information as possible to help resolve the issue.
- [x] I have checked the pinned Issues and searched through existing [open Issues](https://github.com/CherryHQ/cherry-studio/issues) and [closed Issues](https://github.com/CherryHQ/cherry-studio/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aclosed%20) and didn't find similar questions.
- [x] I have written a short and clear title that helps developers quickly understand the nature of my question, rather than vague titles like "A question" or "Help needed".
- [x] My question doesn't fall under bug reports or feature requests categories.

### Platform

Windows

### Version

1.5.6

### Question Description

也曾跟着升级,但最终还是倒退到1.5.6版本。
1.这个版本在使用知识库时,能提供脚注(引用)一目了然,后续版本似乎没有了这个功能;
2.这个版本在@模型、@知识库时,会在对话窗口上列出相应的模型和知识库,一目了然,后续版本似乎没有了这个功能。

### Relevant Context

也曾跟着升级,但最终还是倒退到1.5.6版本。
1.这个版本在使用知识库时,能提供脚注(引用)一目了然,后续版本似乎没有了这个功能;
2.这个版本在@模型、@知识库时,会在对话窗口上列出相应的模型和知识库,一目了然,后续版本似乎没有了这个功能。

### Attempted Solutions

_No response_

### Additional Information

_No response_

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

No source files, tests, or entry points are named. First compare the knowledge-base citation display and the @model/@knowledge_base selections between version 1.5.6 and the current version; done means the requested information is visible in the conversation window in the current release.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
typescript
Domain
frontend
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.