ChainSafe / ChainSafe/open-creator-rails
Internal audit and review of smart contracts
- Dominant language
- Solidity
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 1
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
**What**
Conduct an internal audit of the smart contracts (Asset, AssetRegistry, GameToken, and related interfaces) for security, correctness, and best practices, as well as a general review for optimizations and improvements.
**Why**
An internal audit helps identify vulnerabilities, logic errors, and areas for improvement before external review or mainnet deployment. A broader review for optimizations and improvements can reduce gas costs, enhance maintainability, and refine the design. Together they reduce risk and build confidence in the codebase.
**How**
- Review all smart contracts for security issues (reentrancy, access control, integer overflow, etc.)
- Verify business logic correctness (subscription flows, fee splitting, permit handling)
- Check adherence to Solidity best practices and coding standards
- Identify optimization opportunities (gas, storage, logic)
- Suggest improvements (architecture, readability, error handling, events)
- Document findings in a report with severity and recommendations
- Prioritize and track remediation of identified issues
**Acceptance Criteria**
- All smart contracts have been reviewed
- Security assessment is documented
- Logic and correctness have been verified
- Optimization and improvement suggestions are documented
- Findings report is produced with severity levels
- Critical and high findings have remediation recommendations
**Estimation**
**Dependencies**
Depends on implemented smart contracts (e.g. Asset, AssetRegistry, fee split changes)
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.