Small type for field annotations considered messy

Field annotations have a smaller type than the original key and value of the field. For fields that are prepopulated with a value, this makes visual sense because it distinguishes the original value from the annotations. However, it looks inconsistent if the annotation is the only value. Jeroen felt this made the record detail view less presentable. The distinction argument is also somewhat weakened by the fact that annotations are already recognizable by their attribution tag.

Possible ways to address this:

- Always set field annotations at the same font size as original field values.
- Keep the smaller type, but make an exception for the first annotation to an empty field.