Capgemini / Capgemini/powerapps-specflow-bindings

Allow use of display names over logical names for steps

Open
#74 0 comments 0 reactions 1 assignee Claimed by @rashish12 View on GitHub
enhancement
Dominant language
C#
Stars
42
Forks
27
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

## Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe
Using display names makes tests more readable, an example where this would be useful is in the below steps:
```
When I enter 'test' into the 'new_textfield1' text field on the form
Then I can see a value of 'test' in the 'new_textfield1' text field
```

## Describe the solution you'd like
It would be useful to query the logical name of a field from the user provided display name, rather than forcing them to find out and use the logical name in tests:

```
When I enter 'test' into the 'Description' text field on the form
Then I can see a value of 'test' in the 'Description' text field
```

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.