BetterThanTomorrow / BetterThanTomorrow/dram
Clarify about evaluating the `comment` ”symbol” itself
- Dominant language
- Clojure
- Stars
- 72
- Forks
- 24
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
This issue on Calva https://github.com/BetterThanTomorrow/calva/issues/1273 notes that you get an error when evaluating the `comment` word.
I think the solution is to try clarify that this is expected behaviour. Maybe somewhere here:
https://github.com/BetterThanTomorrow/dram/blob/f4266fddfcf25849e96465917c34abea078dfef3/drams/calva_getting_started/hello_repl.clj#L199
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Read drams/calva_getting_started/hello_repl.clj around line 199 and review the related Calva issue #1273. Clarify in the guide that evaluating the `comment` symbol produces an error because it is expected behavior. Done when the explanation is clear to readers following the REPL guide.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- clojure
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100