Create some conventions for repo descriptions
Open
type:compliance
type:documentation
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
#### What is missing/incorrect?
Would be great if we had some conventions for the repo descriptions so when these are pulled and summarised there's a family resemblence/some key information for someone looking at the repos. (e.g. _interoberability_ , _core_) etc. Feel free to close if this isn't a good idea!
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.