umock_c_negative_tests_fail_call(i); should call umock_error when the call cannot be failed
Open
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 36
- Forks
- 27
- Avg merge
- 32m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
At the moment umock_c_negative_tests_fail_call(i); will waltz unhindered doing "magic" if the "i"th call cannot be failed (such is the case of void functions).
umock_c_negative_tests_fail_call(i) shoul call umock_c_error hook in this case.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start at the implementation and existing tests for umock_c_negative_tests_fail_call(i), then trace how the umock_c_error hook is invoked. Reproduce the void-function case and verify that attempting to fail an un-failable call invokes umock_c_error instead of proceeding silently.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- c
- Domain
- testing
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100