Azure / Azure/Well-Architected-Reliability-Assessment
🪲 Bug Report - Recommending Route Server resources to upgrade from Basic to Standard Virtual WAN
- Dominant language
- PowerShell
- Stars
- 48
- Forks
- 45
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
## Describe the bug
WARA assessment report is recommending Route Server resources to upgrade from Basic to Standard Virtual WAN. Resource type is "microsoft.network/virtualhubs", actual resource id are "/subscriptions/sub-id/resourceGroups/rg-name/providers/Microsoft.Network/virtualHubs/route-server-name"
## To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
1. Identify subscriptions that have Azure Route Server resources
2. Run WARA assessment
## Expected behavior
It seems recommendations are misleading as it doesn't apply to Azure Route Server. Could be a bug need to identity and fix.
## Screenshots 📷
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem. Please feel free to blur/cover any sensitive information.
## Additional context
Anything else we should know to help us troubleshoot this bug?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
No file or test is named. Start by identifying the WARA assessment entry point and reproducing the report for a subscription containing an Azure Route Server; trace how virtual hub resources are classified. Done means Route Server resources no longer receive the Basic-to-Standard Virtual WAN recommendation, while applicable Virtual WAN resources still do.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- azure, powershell
- Domain
- cloud, networking
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100