[Feature Request]: Align networkProfile implementation for VM and VMSS

### Description

VM and VMSS modules implement the `networkProfile` property differently. VM is setting `networkInterfaces` (Ref [here](https://github.com/Azure/ResourceModules/blob/main/modules/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines/deploy.bicep#L463)) while VMSS is setting `networkInterfaceConfigurations` (Ref [here](https://github.com/Azure/ResourceModules/blob/main/modules/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachineScaleSets/deploy.bicep#L429)).

This issue is about aligning the implementation for the two modules.

As part of the alignment, we should also investigate on the warning thrown by the VM module using the resourceId function within its `networkProfile` implementation:

```
Warning use-resource-id-functions: If property "id" represents a resource ID, it must use a symbolic resource reference, be a parameter or start with one of these functions: extensionResourceId, guid, if, reference, resourceId, subscription, subscriptionResourceId, tenantResourceId. [https://aka.ms/bicep/linter/use-resource-id-functions]
```