Can we detect "logical false inclusion" errors made misusing "other"?

I've been thinking about this kind of error for a while now but I just heard this particularly clear example on YouTube channel Logically Answered:
> Besides **Apple**, all **other Android brands** are losing users… except Google.

This awkward sentence structure unwittingly includes Apple as an Android brand.
This particular example makes it worse/more obvious with the word **besides**, but that also makes it harder to fix automatically.

I'll collect more examples here:
- In terms of swag, we each got a hoodie, two t-shirts, and a hat, a Beast Labs toy, a bag of **meat snacks**, and some **other candy**.

The issue provides two example sentences but names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by reviewing the examples and locating the existing handling of “other” and exclusion language; done should mean the intended false-inclusion cases are detected without incorrectly flagging valid uses.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.