AusClimateService / AusClimateService/npcp
Add a second model to the Phase 1 assessment?
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 5
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Sarah Chapman noted when running multi-variate bias correction that she got pretty different results depending on whether the model was too dry or wet compared to the historical climatology.
We might want to process a second model (with a different bias profile to ACCESS-ESM1-5) to check whether the results can be generalised.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by locating the Phase 1 assessment workflow and the inputs or configuration used for ACCESS-ESM1-5. Identify a second model with a different bias profile, process it through the multivariate bias-correction assessment, and compare the results to determine whether the findings generalise.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- jupyter-notebook
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100