process 0 terminated with signal SIGKILL

I am interested your project. It is full of your work.
But i met this bug for this project, please help me! @jph00 @johnowhitaker @KeremTurgutlu @warner-benjamin @geronimi73

World size: 2
Downloading readme: 100%|██████████| 11.6k/11.6k [00:00<00:00, 4.21MB/s]

Downloading data: 0%| | 0.00/44.3M [00:00
def main(
File "/home/sam/anaconda3/envs/fsdp/lib/python3.10/site-packages/fastcore/script.py", line 125, in call_parse
return _f()
File "/home/sam/anaconda3/envs/fsdp/lib/python3.10/site-packages/fastcore/script.py", line 119, in _f
return tfunc(**merge(args, args_from_prog(func, xtra)))
File "/home/sam/Doctorproject/fsdp_qlora/train.py", line 1042, in main
mp.spawn(fsdp_main,
File "/home/sam/anaconda3/envs/fsdp/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/multiprocessing/spawn.py", line 241, in spawn
return start_processes(fn, args, nprocs, join, daemon, start_method="spawn")
File "/home/sam/anaconda3/envs/fsdp/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/multiprocessing/spawn.py", line 197, in start_processes
while not context.join():
File "/home/sam/anaconda3/envs/fsdp/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/multiprocessing/spawn.py", line 140, in join
raise ProcessExitedException(
torch.multiprocessing.spawn.ProcessExitedException: process 0 terminated with signal SIGKILL

Process finished with exit code 1

Start with the traceback in train.py around lines 969 and 1042, then inspect the torch.multiprocessing.spawn path and the FSDP setup referenced by the log. Reproduce the two-process training run if the original invocation and environment are available. Done requires identifying why process 0 receives SIGKILL and confirming a tested fix or a clear diagnosis.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.