Altinity / Altinity/clickhouse-operator

Consider adding a default security context to CHI/CHK

Open
#1,672 0 comments 2 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Go
Stars
2.6k
Forks
574
Avg merge
8d 6h
Merged PRs (30d)
6

Description

spec:
  securityContext:
    fsGroup: 101
    fsGroupChangePolicy: OnRootMismatch
    runAsGroup: 101
    runAsUser: 101

Maybe we can add some syntax sugar for that, and allow user to overwrite

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing how CHI and CHK currently represent the securityContext shown in the issue. Define the proposed syntax sugar and how users can overwrite the defaults; done means the default context is applied while explicit user settings remain effective.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
go, kubernetes
Domain
infrastructure
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.