feat: implement additional field types
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
fields
good first issue
ryx-python
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 13
- Forks
- 5
- Avg merge
- 1h 49m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
Ryx is missing some common field variants.
Goal: Implement PositiveSmallIntegerField, PositiveBigIntegerField, etc...
Implementation hint: Look at ryx/fields.py and see how other numeric fields are implemented.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading ryx/fields.py and compare the existing numeric field implementations. Identify the additional field variants required by the issue, then confirm that each is implemented consistently with the existing fields; the exact list and validation expectations are not specified in the issue.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- databases
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100