Inconsistency with block support classes in ACF blocks

Hey @lgladdy,

currently I'm running some tests to work without the additional block wrapper div so that the frontend result is even more possible in the editor view.

This could be solved if we only use the ACF block wrapper TEMPLATE div for the frontend and prevent the output of this div in the block editor. While working on this, I noticed some inconsistencies with how ACF adds block classes.

Using the block align like "wide" or "full" adds a class name "alignwide" and "alignfull" to the "block-editor-block-list__block" div.

However, this does not work in the case of block alignContent and alignText. If an option is set, class names like has-text-align-left will not be output to the block-editor-block-list__block div. There seems to be an inconsistency here.

Why it's working correct for align but not for alignContent and alignText? It's possible to fix this for us?

Start by reproducing an ACF block in the editor with align, alignContent, and alignText options, then compare the classes on the block-editor-block-list__block div. Trace how ACF adds the working align classes and identify why the other alignment classes are omitted. Done means alignContent and alignText produce the expected editor wrapper classes consistently.