AdguardTeam / AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome
Anyone with IPv6 see things like this?
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 36.9k
- Forks
- 2.5k
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Descripción
### Prerequisites
- [X] I have checked the [Wiki](https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/wiki) and [Discussions](https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/discussions/categories/q-a) and found no answer
- [X] I have searched other issues and found no duplicates
- [X] I want to report a bug and not [ask a question or ask for help](https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/discussions/categories/q-a)
- [X] I have set up AdGuard Home correctly and [configured clients to use it](https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/wiki/Clients). (Use the [Discussions](https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/discussions/categories/q-a) for help with installing and configuring clients.)
### Platform (OS and CPU architecture)
Linux, AMD64 (aka x86_64)
### Installation
Other (please mention in the description)
### Setup
On one machine
### AdGuard Home version
v0.107.52
### Action

Was going over the configs and changing things.. noticed somehow the google ipv6 dns wasn't the shortcut ::8844.. so I fixed it..
no reboot, etc just saved it about an hour ago.. went back to look at something else..
did the ipv6 shortcut syntax increase the time?
### Expected result
Didn't expect there to be any change other than the different ipv6 address..
### Actual result
it looks like changing from 0:0:0:0:8844 to ::8844 increased the time for a response..
### Additional information and/or screenshots
vultr vm ipv6 enabled..
Guía de contribución
Evaluación
Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.