Thread_Local_Storage isn't modeled properly in SPARK
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Ada
- Stars
- 328
- Forks
- 47
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
thread_local_storage is really useful in multithreaded applications (like when using Jorvik or Ravenscar) so having something like this available would be super useful.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating how SPARK currently models thread_local_storage and review the issue's Jorvik and Ravenscar context. Clarify the expected modeling behavior and scope with maintainers before identifying the relevant implementation and tests. Done means thread-local storage is modeled in a way that supports the stated multithreaded use cases.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100