AbsaOSS / AbsaOSS/aries-oob-shortener
RUSTSEC-2020-0071: Potential segfault in the time crate
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Rust
- Sterne
- 2
- Forks
- 0
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.
Beschreibung
> Potential segfault in the time crate
| Details | |
| ------------------- | ---------------------------------------------- |
| Package | `time` |
| Version | `0.1.44` |
| URL | [https://github.com/time-rs/time/issues/293](https://github.com/time-rs/time/issues/293) |
| Date | 2020-11-18 |
| Patched versions | `>=0.2.23` |
| Unaffected versions | `=0.2.0,=0.2.1,=0.2.2,=0.2.3,=0.2.4,=0.2.5,=0.2.6` |
### Impact
Unix-like operating systems may segfault due to dereferencing a dangling pointer in specific circumstances. This requires an environment variable to be set in a different thread than the affected functions. This may occur without the user's knowledge, notably in a third-party library.
The affected functions from time 0.2.7 through 0.2.22 are:
- `time::UtcOffset::local_offset_at`
- `time::UtcOffset::try_local_offset_at`
- `time::UtcOffset::current_local_offset`
- `time::UtcOffset::try_current_local_offset`
- `time::OffsetDateTime::now_local`
- `time::OffsetDateTime::try_now_local`
The affected functions in time 0.1 (all versions) are:
- `at`
- `at_utc`
- `now`
Non-Unix targets (including Windows and wasm) are unaffected.
### Patches
Pending a proper fix, the internal method that determines the local offset has been modified to always return `None` on the affected operating systems. This has the effect of returning an `Err` on the `try_*` methods and `UTC` on the non-`try_*` methods.
Users and library authors with time in their dependency tree should perform `cargo update`, which will pull in the updated, unaffected code.
Users of time 0.1 do not have a patch and should upgrade to an unaffected version: time 0.2.23 or greater or the 0.3 series.
### Workarounds
No workarounds are known.
See [advisory page](https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2020-0071.html) for additional details.
Beitragsleitfaden
Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert
Bewertung
Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.