Evaluate the use of derive_builder for implementing builders in our project

# Background:
In our current project, we have several instances where we're implementing builder patterns manually for constructing complex objects. This process has become error-prone and cumbersome as our project scales. To improve developer efficiency and maintain code quality, we're considering the use of the [derive_builder](https://crates.io/crates/derive_builder) crate.

# Proposal:
The derive_builder crate offers a macro to automatically implement the builder pattern for any given struct. This could potentially reduce boilerplate code and make our codebase more maintainable. Before proceeding, we need to assess the feasibility and implications of integrating this crate into our project.

- Points for Discussion:
Ease of Integration: How easily can derive_builder be integrated into our existing codebase? What changes would be required, and how disruptive might they be?

- Flexibility: Does derive_builder offer enough flexibility to cover our use cases? Are there any limitations we should be aware of?

- Performance: How does the use of derive_builder impact compile-time and runtime performance? Is there a significant overhead compared to our manual implementations?

- Learning Curve: What is the learning curve associated with derive_builder? Considering our team's current Rust expertise, how much effort would be required to get everyone up to speed?

- Maintenance and Support: How actively is derive_builder maintained? Are there any known issues or bugs that could affect our usage?

- Community and Ecosystem: How widely is derive_builder used in the Rust ecosystem? Can we find examples of other projects similar to ours that are using it successfully?

- Alternatives: Are there other crates or patterns we should consider as alternatives to derive_builder? How do they compare in terms of the criteria above?

# Next Steps:
Based on the discussion, we should decide whether to proceed with integrating derive_builder, explore alternatives, or continue with our current approach. If we decide to move forward with derive_builder, we'll need to outline an implementation plan and assign responsibilities.

# Call to Action:
Please share your thoughts, experiences, and any relevant insights on the use of derive_builder in the comments below. Your feedback is crucial for making an informed decision.