AI-Planning / AI-Planning/planning-as-a-service
Plan(s) listing in the `result` structure
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Python
- Sterne
- 43
- Forks
- 13
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.
Beschreibung
I do not see a reason for exposing internal implementation details in the returned structure. If the planner finds multiple plans, they should be returned in a uniform structure such as
```json
{
"result": {
"plans": [
]
}
}
```
Currently I see `result.output.plan` as well as `result.output.sas_plan` or `result.output.sas_plan.1`. We are bleeding implementation details through the interface. Or I at least cannot see any added value here.
I am not discussing here whether the content of the `plans` array should be strings (as today) or some rich structure. But it should be an array capturing plans in order of discovery.
Beitragsleitfaden
Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert
Bewertung
Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.