Clarify whether the :@ attribute syntax is required or not
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Nunjucks
- Stars
- 547
- Forks
- 726
- Avg merge
- 2h 23m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
This example suggests that you can use a :@ start to dynamic attributes, but doesn't say why, whether it's required or recommended, and whether it changes behavior.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the documentation page containing the attached example with the :@ dynamic-attribute syntax. Clarify whether the prefix is required, recommended, or optional, and document whether using it changes behavior. Done means the example and surrounding explanation answer all three questions.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100